Social and Economic Analysis of America - 1671 Words

501 Essay Exam Question 1: â€Å"The Measure of America† showed us that ethnic minorities in the United States have higher rates of incarceration, unemployment and poverty, and more health problems than Caucasian Americans. They are also less likely to graduate high school or move on to college. As anecdotes from the Eitzen text revealed ethnic minorities are often forced to accept less desirable jobs, and if they are illegal immigrants their choices are even more limited. Immigrants most learn a new culture and often a new language as well. They face racism and the stigma that they are stealing ‘American’ jobs. If they are illegal, immigrants must also worry about keeping a low profile to avoid deportation. While it has improved, racism still exists in our society. It is hard to raise oneself out of poverty, and if institutions and society are working against you it is even harder. Question 2: Despite campaigns since the 1970’s, women still make only $0.77 for every $1.00 their male colleagues make. They are more likely to be unemployed and living below the poverty threshold. They are also more likely to be the head of a single parent household. Mothers in single parent households must struggle with working, childcare, and providing for their family while trying to get ahead in life. These facts combined meant that there has been a ‘feminization of poverty’. Question 3: Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory begins with the individual. Resilience factors forShow MoreRelatedRelationship Between Social Institutions And Economic Growth By Comparing Countries From East Asia And Latin America1072 Words   |  5 Pagespolicies in East Asia and Latin America, the existing literature mainly focuses on the government’s role in the nation’s economic growth (e.g., Haggard and Cheng 1987; Krugman 1994; Birdsall and Jaspersen, 1997; Todaro and Smith2003). There is a lack of research in the effect of social institutions on economic performance in these two regions. The main proposition of this research is an analytical focus on the relationship between social institutions and economic growth by comparing countries fromRead MoreFour approaches to the political economy development of Latin America1734 Words   |  7 PagesThe study of development in Latin America has been approached from a variety of academic disciplines. Inte rnational Political Economy scholars have provided a number of different approaches for studying, analyzing and understanding the political and institutional constrains that have shaped the development of Latin American countries. They have also incorporated into the analysis variables such as the influence of international organizations and the economic and class history, and its relation withRead MoreConflict Analysis : Mexico And Central America1687 Words   |  7 Pages In this paper, I will focus on Policy Issues through Conflict Analysis in Latin America. First, I will talk about the differences and critiques in the Merida Initiative: Mexico and Central America. Then, I will focus on â€Å"Drug War†: Lenses, Frames, and â€Å"Seeing† Solutions. I will then talk about, â€Å"conflict analysis ¬Ã‚ ¬Ã‚ ¬Ã‚ ¬, a lens for viewing conflict that brings into focus a multilevel, integrative diagnosis of the violence in Mexico and supports recent evolutions in Plan Merida toward a more holisticRead MoreIs Globalization Good for Workers? Definitions and Evidence from Latin America1118 Words   |  5 Pagesglobalization is seen as a beneficial asset for workers, while on the other hand, various sociologists, anthropologists, and historians would beg to differ. Several data determines that even though globalization has increased average incomes in Latin America, the cases of employment quality still tend to be deteriorating. It is important t o note the different dimensions of the effect globalization has caused and mechanisms that either benefit or harm workers in changes found within labour demand and workRead MoreSynthesis Essay - race and class1447 Words   |  6 PagesWhat is the relationship between social class and race? This question is both problematic and significant because, when attempting to analyze social classes in America, it is important to determine what factors contribute to the establishment of social class. In modern America, despite advancements in civil rights and equality, many things are still divided along racial lines. Are individuals of different races set on pre-determined courses for specific social classes, due simply to their skinRead MoreThe Gap Between The White And Black Workforce1106 Words   |  5 PagesAmerican labor market. Dependent variable is based on the overarching economic conditions that effect both whites and blacks, and the Independent variable of managerial positions available in the workforce. Quane et al (2015) provide data collected from the U.S. meta-data that describes the economic and social construct of employment and cultural barriers in the African-American community from the 1970s to the 2000s. Data analysis from this study reveals the lack of governmental cultural networksRead MoreMktg209 Research Paper1432 Words   |  6 PagesThe success of Cochlear Cochlear’s macro-environment and global marketing mix Analysis Abstract: To analyze the reason why Cochlear is successful, it is better to inspect it from a worldwide range. This essay uses PESTLE model to analyze its macro-environments in different countries and regions, and then discuss the impact of these factors. This essay also uses a number of examples to illustrate Cochlear s responding global marketing mix, to further emphasize the deep impact. TableRead MoreIslam and Continuities1628 Words   |  7 Pagestwo of the regions of the world from 8000 BCE to present.   Ã‚  Ã‚   Europe  Ã‚  Ã‚   Sub-Saharan Africa  Ã‚  Ã‚   the Middle East  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚   East Asia   Ã‚  Ã‚   SE Asia  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚     South Asia  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚   Latin America  Ã‚  Ã‚   North America †¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Analyze the changes and continuities in China from the Zhou to the Song. Be sure to address political, social and economic factors as well as outside influences. †¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Trace and analyze the evolution of slavery and serfdom from prehistoric times to the end of the 19th century in TWO of the followingRead MoreIkea Swot Analysis966 Words   |  4 PagesAhere are certain tools that helps in developing an insight view of the company such as PESTLE/STEP analysis, SWOT, resourced based view and value chain, which helps in giving the information that reveals the current position of the firm in the market. Further, these tools have been used to analyse Goldman Sachs. â€Å"A company which is a leading global financial services firm providing investment banking, securities and investment management services to a substantial and diversified client base thatRead MoreBlack Masculinity Through The Media923 Words   |  4 Pagesresearch will investigate black masculinity through the mass media in the United States of America. The social perception of black men through the media becomes a social understand. Qualitative research develops a deeper understanding on the lived experience of the individual. Qualitative research relays on the experience and the researcher’s interpretation of the experience to created universal understand of a social issue. Qualitative method interpreted the visual experience which requires the researcher

Rise of the Superpowers (USA USSR) from events p Essay Example For Students

Rise of the Superpowers (USA USSR) from events p Essay rior to and duringWWIIWorld War II: the process of superpowerdomIt is often wondered how the superpowers achieved their position ofdominance. It seems that the maturing of the two superpowers, Russiaand the United States, can be traced to World War II. To be asuperpower, a nation needs to have a strong economy, an overpoweringmilitary, immense international political power and, related to this, astrong national ideology. It was this war, and its results, that causedeach of these superpowers to experience such a preponderance of power. Before the war, both nations were fit to be described as great powers,but it would be erroneous to say that they were superpowers at thatpoint.To understand how the second World War impacted these nations sogreatly, we must examine the causes of the war.The United Statesgained its strength in world affairs from its status as an economicpower.In the years before the war, America was the worlds largestproducer. In the USSR at the same time, Stalin was imp lementing hisfive year plans to modernise the Soviet economy. From thesesituations, similar foreign policies resulted from widely divergentorigins. Roosevelts isolationism emerged from the wide and prevalent domesticdesire to remain neutral in any international conflicts. It commonlywidely believed that Americans entered the first World War simply inorder to save industrys capitalist investments in Europe. Whether thisis the case or not, Roosevelt was forced to work with an inherentlyisolationist Congress, only expanding its horizons after the bombing ofPearl Harbour.He signed the Neutrality Act of 1935, making it illegalfor the United States to ship arms to the belligerents of any conflict. The act also stated that belligerents could buy only non-armaments fromthe US, and even these were only to be bought with cash. In contrast, Stalin was by necessity interested in European affairs, butonly to the point of concern to the USSR. Russian foreign policy wasfundamentally Leninist in it s concern to keep the USSR out of war. Stalin wanted to consolidate Communist power and modernise the countrysindustry. The Soviet Union was committed to collective action forpeace, as long as that commitment did not mean that the Soviet Unionwould take a brunt of a Nazi attack as a result. Examples of this canbe seen in the Soviet Unions attempts to achieve a mutual assistancetreaty with Britain and France. These treaties, however, were designedmore to create security for the West, as opposed to keeping all threesignatories from harm.At the same time, Stalin was attempting topolarise both the Anglo-French, and the Axis powers against each other. The important result of this was the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact,which partitioned Poland, and allowed Hitler to start the war. Anotherside-effect of his policy of playing both sides was that it causedincredible distrust towards the Soviets from the Western powers after1940. This was due in part to the fact that Stalin made several dema ndsfor both influence in the Dardanelles, and for Bulgaria to be recognisedas a Soviet dependant.The seeds of superpowerdom lie here however, in the late thirties. R.J. Overy has written that stability in Europe might have been achievedthrough the existence of powers so strong that they could impose theirwill on the whole of the international system, as has been the casesince 1945.At the time, there was no power in the world that couldachieve such a feat. Britain and France were in imperial decline, andmore concerned about colonial economics than the stability of Europe. Both imperial powers assumed that empire-building would necessarily bean inevitable feature of the world system.German aggression couldhave been stifled early had the imperial powers had acted in concert. The memories of World War One however, were too powerful, and thegeneral public would not condone a military solution at that point. The aggression of Germany, and to a lesser extent that of Italy, can beexplained by this decline of imperial power. They were simplyattempting to fill the power vacuum in Europe that Britain and Franceunwittingly left. After the economic crisis of the 1930s, Britain andFrance lost much of their former international standingas the worldmarkets plummeted; so did their relative power. The two nations weredetermined to maintain their status as great powers however, withoutrelying on the US or the USSR for support of any kind.They went towar only because further appeasement would have only served to removefrom them their little remaining world standing and prestige. The creation of a non-aggression pact between the Soviet Union andGermany can be viewed as an example of imperial decline as well. Stalinexplained the fact that he reached a rapprochement with Germany, and notone with Great Britain by stating that the USSR and Germany had wantedto change the old equilibrium England and France wanted to preserveit. Germany also wanted to make a change in the equilibrium, and thiscommon desire to get rid of the old equilibrium had created the basisfor the rapprochement with Germany.The common desire of many of thegreat European powers for a change in the world state system meant thateither a massive war would have to be fought; or that one of the greatpowers would need to attempt to make the leap to superpower statuswithout reaping the advantages such a conflict could give to the powermaking the attempt. Such benefits as wartime economic gains, vastlyincreased internal markets from conquered territory, and increasedaccess to resources and th e means of industrial production would helpfuel any nations drive for superpowerdom.One of two ways war could have been avoided was for the United States orRussia to have taken powerful and vigorous action against Germany in1939. Robert A. Divine, holds that superpowerdom gives a nation theframework by which a nation is able to extend globally the reach of itspower and influence.This can be seen especially as the ability tomake other nations (especially in the Third World) act in ways that thesuperpower prefers, even if this is not in the weaker nations selfinterest. The question must then be raised, were the United States andRussia superpowers even then, could coercive, unilateral actions takenby them have had such significant ramifications for the internationalorder? It must be concluded that, while they were not yet superpowers,they certainly were great powers, with the incredible amount ofinfluence that accompanies such status. Neither the United States northe Soviet Union posse ssed the international framework necessary to be asuper power at this time. It is likely that frameworks similar to Natoor the Warsaw Pact could have been developed, but such infrastructureswould have necessarily been on a much smaller scale, and withoutinfluence as the proposed Anglo-American (English speaking world) pactwas. At this time, neither the United States nor Russia had developedthe overwhelming advantages that they possessed at the end of the war. There are several factors that allowed them to become superpowers: apreponderance of military force, growing economies, and the creation ofideology-backed blocs of power. The United States, it seems, did not become a superpower by accident. Indeed, Roosevelt had a definite European policy that was designed fromthe start to secure a leading role for the United States. The USnon-policy which ignored Eastern Europe in the late thirties andforties, while strongly supported domestically, was another means toRoosevelts plans to achie ve US world supremacy. After the war, Roosevelt perceived that the way to dominate worldaffairs was to reduce Europes international role (visvis the UnitedStates, as the safest way of preventing future world conflict), thecreation of a permanent superpower rivalry with the USSR to ensure worldstability.Roosevelt sought to reduce Europes geopolitical role byensuring the fragmentation of the continent into small, relativelypowerless, and ethnically homogenous states. When viewed in light ofthese goals Roosevelt appears very similar to Stalin who, in Churchillswords, Wanted a Europe composed of little states, disjointed, separate,and weak.Roosevelt was certain that World War Two would destroycontinental Europe as a military and economic force, removing Germanyand France from the stage of world powers. This would leave the UnitedStates, Great Britain, and the USSR as the last remaining European worldpowers. Underground Railroad Argumentative EssayAmerica has tried to achieve an open world economy for over a century. From the attempts to keep the open door policy in China to Article VIIof the Lend-Lease act, free trade has been seen as central to Americansecurity. The United States, in 1939, forced Great Britain to begin tomove away from its imperial economic system. Cordell Hull, thenSecretary of State, was extremely tough with Great Britain on thispoint. He used Article VII of the Lend-Lease, which demanded thatBritain not create any more colonial economic systems after the war. Churchill fought this measure bitterly, realising that it would mean theeffective end of the British Empire, as well as meaning that GreatBritain would no longer be able to compete economically with the UnitedStates.However, Churchill did eventually agree to it, realising thatwithout the help of the United States, he would lose much more thanGreat Britains colonies. American leadership of the international ec onomythanks to theinstitutions created at Bretton Woods in 1944, its strong backing forEuropean integration with the Marshall Plan in 1947 and support for theSchuman Plan thereafter (both dependent in good measure on Americanpower) created the economic, cultural, military, and political momentumthat enabled liberal democracy to flourish in competition with Sovietcommunism. It was the adoption of the Marshall Plan that allowed Western Europe tomake its quick economic recovery from the ashes of World War II. Theseeds of the massive expansion of the military-industrial complex of theearly fifties are also to be found in the post war recovery. Feelingthreatened by the massive amount of aid the United States was givingWestern Europe, the Soviet Union responded with its form of economic aidto its satellite counties. This rivalry led to the Western fear ofSoviet domination, and was one of the precursors to the arms-race of theCold War. The foundation for the eventual rise of the Superpower s is clearly foundin the years leading up to and during World War II. The possibility ofthe existence of superpowers arose from the imperial decline of GreatBritain and France, and the power vacuum that this decline created inEurope. Germany and Italy tried to fill this hole while Britain andFrance were more concerned with their colonial empires. The UnitedStates and the Soviet Union ended the war with vast advantages inmilitary strength. At the end of the war, the United States was in thesingular position of having the worlds largest and strongest economy. This allowed them to fill the power gap left in Europe by the decliningimperial powers. Does this, however, make them Superpowers? With the strong ideologiesthat they both possessed, and the ways in which they attempted todiffuse this ideology through out the world after the war, it seems thatit would. The question of Europe having been settled for the most part,the two superpowers rushed to fill the power vacuum left by Japan in Asia. It is this, the global dimension of their political, military andeconomic presence that makes the United States and the USSRsuperpowers. It was the rapid expansion of the national andinternational structures of the Soviet Union and the United Statesduring the war that allowed them to assume their roles as superpowers. BibliographyAga-Rossi, Elena. Roosevelts European Policy and the Origins of theCold War Telos. Issue 96, Summer 93: pp.65-86. Divine, Robert A. The Cold War as History Reviews in American History. Issue 3, vol. 21, Sept 93: 26-32. Dukes, Paul. The Last Great Game: Events, Conjectures, Structures. London: Pinter Publishers, 1989 Le Ferber, Walter. The American Age: US Foreign Policy at Home andAbroad 170 to the Present. New York: W.W. Norton Company, 1994. Morrison, Samuel Elliot. The Two-Ocean War. Boston, MA: AtlanticLittle, Brown, 1963. Overy, R.J. The Origins of the Second World War. New York: LongmanInc, 1987. Ovyany Igor. The Origins of World War Two. Moscow: Novosti PressAgency Publishing House, 1989. Smith, Tony. The United States and the Global Struggle for Democracy,in Americas Mission: The United States and Democracy in the TwentiethCentury (New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995)http://epn.org/tcf/xxstru 03.html. 1995Strik-Strikfeldt, Wilfried. Against Stalin and Hitler. Bungay,Suffolk: Richard Clay (The Chaucer Press), 1970.1. Overy R.J. The Origins of the Second World War (Longman: NewYork) 1987 p.7 Overy pp. 88-89 2. Overy p .8 3. Ovsyany, Igor. The Origins of World War Two (Novosti PressAgency: Moscow) 1989 pp. 31-34. 4. Overy p. 70 5. Overy p. 85 6. Overy p. 89 7. Overy p. 91 8. Aga-Rossi p. 81 9. Divine, Robert A. The Cold War as History Reviews inAmerican History, Sept 93, vol 21. p. 528. 10. Aga-Rossi, Elena. Roosevelts European Policy and theOrigins of the Cold War Telos Summer 93. Issue 96 pp. 65-66 11. Aga-Rossi p. 66 12. Aga-Rossi p. 69 13. Aga-Rossi p. 72 14. Aga-Rossi p. 73 15. Aga-Rossi p. 77 16. Aga-Rossi p. 70 17. Divine p. 528 18. Aga-Rossi p. 80 19. Aga-Rossi p. 68 20. Aga-Rossi pp. 74-75 21. Aga-Rossi p. 79. 22. Aga-Rossi p. 83. 23. Tony Smith, The United States and the Global Struggle forDemocracy, in Americas Mission: TheUnited States and Democracy in the Twentieth Century (New York:Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995)http://epn.org/tcf/xxstru 03.html. 1995 24. Dukes, Paul. The Last Great Game: Events, Conjectures,Structures (Pinter Publishers: London) 1989p. 107. 25. Le Ferber, Walter. The American Age: US Foreign Policy atHome and Abroad 170 to the Present. (W.W. Norton Company: New York) 1994 p. 417-418. 26. Tony Smith, The United States and the Global Struggle forDemocracy, in Americas Mission: TheUnited States and Democracy in the Twentieth Century (New York:Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995)http://epn.org/tcf/xxstru 03.html. 1995